Boards, commissions and committees

It determines university policy, notably by deliberating on the content of the establishment contract. It votes on the annual budget and approves the accounts, oversees job allocations, and distributes equipment and operating credits. It authorizes the Chairman to institute legal proceedings. It approves agreements and conventions. It approves the President's annual activity report and the social report. It approves decisions of the Academic Board with financial implications. Finally, it votes on the statutes of the university and its various components (UFRs, institutes, schools, shared services, etc.) and decides on issues relating to campus development (building construction, space planning).

Theuniversité Savoie Mont Blanc Board of Directors is currently made up of 28 elected members (elected on March 15, 2016), including 8 professors and equivalent staff (college A), 8 other teachers and equivalent staff (college B), 6 administrative staff (college C), 6 students (college D - users). It is completed by 8 outside personalities appointed by the local authorities and by the elected members of the Board. The university president is also an ex-officio member. In principle, it meets one Tuesday a month.

At academics restreinte, the Board of Directors examines individual questions relating to teacher-researchers and secondary school teachers. It issues an opinion on the assignment of candidates to teaching-research posts.

At academics plenary session, the Academic Council is consulted on, or may issue recommendations concerning, policy guidelines for academics, research, the dissemination of scientific, technical and industrial culture, and scientific and technical documentation, the qualifications to be given to vacant or requested teaching/research positions, accreditation applications, and the establishment contract.
It is also consulted on all measures aimed at guaranteeing students' academic, trade union and political freedoms.

Academic Council decisions with financial implications are subject to approval by the Board of Directors.
Following a call for candidates from all university users, the full Academic Council elects the student vice-president. If the student vice-president is not an elected member of the Academic Board, he or she may nevertheless attend the Board in an advisory capacity.

The Academic Council, sitting at academics , restricted to teacher-researchers, is the body responsible for examining individual issues relating to the recruitment, assignment and career of teacher-researchers, the integration of civil servants from other bodies into the teacher-researchers corps, and the recruitment or renewal of temporary teaching and research assistants (ATER).

It is consulted on all matters relating to the establishment's project; it examines all questions submitted to it by the President, in particular those concerning the academics and research units, schools and institutes. It may issue recommendations and opinions. These are forwarded to the Academic Council and the Board of Directors by the President.

In addition, the president or vice-president in charge of human resources conducts a management dialogue with the components, in order to define their objectives and resources.

It distributes the resources earmarked for research as allocated by the Board of Directors and subject to the strategic framework for its distribution, as defined by the Board of Directors. It sets the operating rules for Research units and is consulted on agreements with research organizations. It adopts measures to enable teachers to develop activities to disseminate scientific, technical and industrial culture.

The Research Commission is currently made up of 32 elected members (elected on March 15, 2016): 12 professors and similar staff (college A), 3 research supervisors (college B), 8 PhD staff (college C), 1 non-PhD teacher (college D), 3 engineers and technicians (college E), 1 "other staff" (college F) 3 students (including 2 elected on March 15, 2016 college G - users -), and 4 external personalities.

In principle, it meets one Thursday a month.

It is consulted on academics component programs. It adopts the distribution of the resources earmarked for academics as allocated by the Board of Directors and subject to the strategic framework for its distribution, as defined by the Board of Directors, as well as examination regulations, teaching evaluation rules, measures to promote student success, improve student living conditions, guidance, validation of prior learning, cultural, sports, social and community policies, etc. It also adopts measures to promote and develop interaction between science and society, initiated and led by students or teachers, as well as measures to promote and develop interaction between science and society, initiated and led by students or teachers, as well as measures to promote and develop interaction between science and society, initiated and led by students or teachers, as well as measures to promote and develop interaction between science and society, initiated and led by students or teachers, as well as measures to promote and develop interaction between science and society. It also adopts measures designed to promote and develop interactions between science and society, initiated and led by students or teachers, as well as measures necessary for the reception and success of students with disabilities.

The Commission de la academics et de la vie universitaire is currently made up of 28 elected members (elected on March 15, 2016): 6 professors and assimilated staff (college A), 6 other professors and assimilated staff (college B), 4 staff representatives, 12 members of the student college (college C - users - ) and 4 external personalities.

In principle, it meets one Thursday a month.

The CER-USMB proposes to identify the ethical issues ethical issues that may arise from the protocols and protocols and research projects defined by professors and and researchers who request the committee's opinion before the conduct of their research, in compliance with the various the various codes of ethicsgoverning the activities of and researchers.

This evaluation may be requested in connection with the submission of a project to a funding organization or a publication, as well as at the initiative of a team soucto obtain an ethical opinion on its scientific scientific approach. The CER-USMB cannot sution to any other committee whose referral is provided for by law or regulation. regulations, such as such as the Committee of Protection of Personnes (CPP) or or the Comité Ethics on Experimentation (CEEA). The CER-USMB has no vocation to exercise the mission of the deontological referent and to rule on compliance with the obligations and probligations and principles defined by the civil service statute. of the civil service.

Bernard ANSELEM, Doctor of Medicine, Neuropsychologist

Marine BEAUDOIN, MCF - Inter-university Psychology Laboratory (LIP/PC2S), USMB

Pascal BOUCHEZ, Doctor of Philosophy, CER President, Lecturer (USMB, UFR LLSH)

Martine BOUVARD, Professor of Clinical Psychology - LPNC Laboratory, USMB

Pascal BOUVIER, MCF - Philosophy, LLSETI Laboratory, USMB

Christophe COURTIN, MCF - SYMME Laboratory, USMB

Mélanie DUVAL, CNRS Research Associate, EDYTEM,USMB

Noémie HENRY, Master of Public Law, Head of the Legal Department (USMB)

Dominique LAGORGETTE, Professor of Language Sciences, LLSETI Laboratory, USMB

Anne LOISON, CNRS Research Director - LECA Laboratory, USMB

Laurent MESSONNIER, Professor of Physiology/Human Biology - Inter-University Motor Biology Laboratory (LIBM), USMB

Sonia PELLISSIER, PhD in Pharmacology - MCF in Psychology - Inter-university Psychology Laboratory (LIP/PC2S), USMB

Thomas RUPP, MCF - Inter-University Laboratory of Motor Biology (LIBM), USMB