Boards, commissions and committees

It determines the university's policy, in particular by deliberating on the content of the establishment contract. It votes on the annual budget and approves the accounts, manages the allocation of posts, and distributes the credits linked to equipment and operations. It authorizes the President to institute any legal action. It approves agreements and conventions. It approves the President's annual activity report and the social balance sheet. It approves the decisions of the Academic Council with financial implications. Finally, it votes on the statutes of the university and the various components (UFR, institutes, school, common services, etc.) and decides on issues relating to campus development (construction of buildings, space planning).

The Board of Directors of the University of Savoie Mont Blanc is currently composed of 28 elected members (elected on 15 March 2016) including 8 professors and related staff (college A), 8 other professors and related staff (college B), 6 BIATSS (college C), 6 students (college D - users). It is completed by 8 external personalities designated by the communities and by the elected members of the council. The president of the university is also an ex-officio member. It meets, in principle, one Tuesday per month.

In academics restricted, the Board is seized to examine individual questions relating to teacher-researchers and secondary school teachers. It issues an opinion on the assignment of candidates to a teaching-research position.

In the plenary session of academics , the Academic Council is consulted or can express its wishes on the orientations of the policies of academics, research, on the dissemination of scientific, technical and industrial culture and scientific and technical documentation, on the qualification to be given to vacant or requested posts of teacher-researchers, on the application for accreditation, on the establishment contract.
It is also consulted on all measures to guarantee the exercise of academic freedom and the trade union and political freedoms of students.

Decisions of the Academic Council with financial implications are subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.
Following a call for nominations from all university users, the full Academic Council elects the Student Vice-President. If the student vice-president is not an elected member of the Academic Council, he or she may nevertheless participate in the Academic Council in an advisory capacity.

The Academic Council sitting at academics restricted to teacher-researchers is the competent body to decide on the examination of individual questions relating to the recruitment, assignment and career of teacher-researchers, and on the integration of civil servants from other bodies into the teaching-researchers' corps and on the recruitment or renewal of temporary teaching attachés and research (ATER).

It is consulted on all matters relating to the school project; it examines all questions submitted to it by the President, in particular those concerning the units of academics and research, schools and institutes. It may issue wishes and opinions. These are transmitted to the Academic Council and the Board of Directors by the President.

In addition, the President or the Vice-President in charge of Human Resources, conducts a management dialogue with the components in order to determine their objectives and means.

It allocates the envelope of resources intended for research as allocated by the Board of Directors and subject to the strategic framework for its distribution, as defined by the Board of Directors. It sets the operating rules for the units of research and is consulted on the agreements with the organisations of research. It shall adopt measures to enable teachers to develop activities for the dissemination of scientific, technical and industrial culture.

The research commission is currently made up of 32 elected members (elected on 15 March 2016): 12 professors and assimilated (college A), 3 staff members authorized to direct research (college B), 8 staff members with a doctorate (college C), 1 teacher without a doctorate (college D), 3 engineers and technicians (college E), 1 "other staff" (college F), 3 students (including 2 elected on 15 March 2016 college G - users), and 4 external personalities.

It meets, in principle, one Thursday a month.

It is consulted on the component programs at academics . It adopts the distribution of the envelope of means intended for academics as allocated by the Board of Directors and subject to the strategic framework for its distribution, as defined by the Board of Directors, as well as examination regulations, rules for evaluating teaching, measures relating to student success, improvement of student living conditions, orientation, validation of prior learning, cultural, sports, social, associative policies, etc. It also adopts measures designed to promote and develop interactions between science and society initiated and led by students or teachers, as well as measures necessary for the reception and success of students with disabilities.

The academics and University Life Commission is currently composed of 28 elected members (elected on March 15, 2016): 6 professors and assimilated personnel (college A), 6 other professors and assimilated personnel (college B), 4 staff representatives, 12 members of the college students (college C - users - ) and 4 external personalities.

It meets, in principle, one Thursday a month.

The CER-USMB proposes to identify the issues ethical issues that may arise from the protocols and
projects of research defined by the teachers-researchers and researchers who apply for the committee's opinion before the
conduct of their work at research, with due regard for the of the various codes of ethicsgoverning the activity of the
teachers and researchers.

This assessment can be requested in the context of submitting a project to a funding body
or publication, as well as on the initiative of a concerned teamThe European Commission is keen to obtain ethical advice on its approach
scientific. The CER-USMB cannot be sure of its ownbstitute to another committee whose referral is provided for by law or by the
regulation, such as that the Committee from Protection of Personnes (PPC) or still the Committee Ethics on
Animal Experimentation (CEEA). The CER-USMB did not want toto carry out the mission of the compliance officer
and to decide on compliance with obligations and requirements.ethical principles defined by the Staff Regulations.
public.

Bernard ANSELEM, Doctor of Medicine, Neuropsychologist

Marine BEAUDOIN, MCF - Inter-University Psychology Laboratory (LIP/PC2S), USMB

Pascal BOUCHEZ, Doctor of Philosophy, President CER, Lecturer (USMB, UFR LLSH)

Martine BOUVARD, Professor of Clinical Psychology - LPNC Laboratory, USMB

Pascal BOUVIER, MCF - Philosophy, LLSETI Laboratory, USMB

Christophe COURTIN, MCF - SYMME Laboratory, USMB

Mélanie DUVAL, CNRS Research Fellow, EDYTEM, USMB

Noémie HENRY, Master of Public Law, Head of the Legal Unit (USMB)

Dominique LAGORGETTE, Professor of Language Sciences, LLSETI Laboratory, USMB

Anne LOISON, CNRS Research Director - LECA Laboratory, USMB

Laurent MESSONNIER, Professor of Physiology/Human Biology - Inter-University Laboratory of Motor Biology (LIBM), USMB

Sonia PELLISSIER, PhD in Pharmacology - MCF in Psychology - Inter-University Laboratory of Psychology (LIP/PC2S), USMB

Thomas RUPP, MCF - Inter-University Laboratory of Motor Biology (LIBM), USMB